We’ve all heard it. Readable. Reusable. Testable. Maintainable. “Clean Code” has become the holy grail of software development. The books, the blog posts, the conference talks — all hammer home the same gospel: write clean code, or don’t code at all.
But here’s the honest question that needs to be asked:
Are we worshipping "clean" at the expense of progress?
Let me explain.
🚧 The Problem with Perfectionism
Many developers — especially juniors and even some seniors — hesitate to push code because it’s “not clean enough.” They refactor and refactor, chasing some idealistic architecture that only exists in textbooks or blog tutorials.
Meanwhile, that crucial feature? Still not shipped. That prototype that could’ve been tested with users? Still in a branch, waiting to be "cleaned."
We’ve turned code cleanliness into a blocker for experimentation.
🧠 Why the Brain Doesn’t Think in Clean Code
Here’s something to consider: most of us don’t think in clean code. Our problem-solving process is messy. We scribble in pseudocode, talk it out loud, write TODO comments and spaghetti logic until the picture becomes clear.
So why do we shame this natural messiness in version control? Why is a messy first draft in writing celebrated, but a messy commit is frowned upon?
Maybe we need more "clean commits", not just clean code. Get the idea out. Then improve. But build momentum first.
💬 A Call for Real Talk
I’m not saying to ditch principles or write unmaintainable code. But I am saying that the pressure to write flawless code from line one is harming creativity, delaying delivery, and intimidating developers.
The best teams I’ve worked with understood this: they shipped, then they shaped. They designed as they iterated. They embraced technical debt the way a founder embraces risk — strategically.
🤔 So I Ask You:
When was the last time you shipped “ugly” code that solved a real problem?
How do you balance iteration vs. perfection?
Do we put too much pressure on juniors to write code like seniors?
Let’s open this up — not just for debate, but for real developer growth. Because maybe done is better than clean... until it’s time to scale.
Looking forward to your thoughts. 👇
Want more like this? Let’s connect — or better yet, respond with your own dev confession.
Top comments (3)
100% I agree. There's a book called "the messy middle" which I haven't yet read but the creative process is messy and involves a lot of false starts.
Moreover, good code (functional programming) requires statelessness. I love functional programming but as you say, the brain does not think that way. You gradually transform state.
Think Linux was written out of nothing? Think again. Even Unix was a reimagination of Multics. Progress doesn't come by shooting down stepping stones. The only way to do something perfectly first time is to have done something identical before (i.e. cheat).
I've had managers complain about my code when really they are insecure trying to show off their skills instead of focusing on the business functionality that is being fulfilled. The only way to deliver something perfectly is to have done the same thing before (i.e. not provide any new exploratory work at all). I've seen classmates at college copy projects from semesters prior. What progress is really being made?
No one says you have to apply clean code from the beginning. Eventually everything will be technical debt so you have to find a way that works for you or your team
Pretty cool take honestly, I waste way too many hours trying to make stuff perfect before it even works